Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] iso 100.000+??
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:49:04 +0200
References: <C7073504.3A26%lug@steveunsworth.co.uk> <360827.67031.qm@web55908.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <a3f189160910231009s24b37be1vc66a694fc218d399@mail.gmail.com>

What Sonny wrote below describes 99% of my photography. This week has  
been very busy with my non-photo day job. Lots of meetings, an entire  
day spent with a flock of German trademark lawyers, more meetings and  
so on. And yet, I am quite confident that when I go through the week's  
images on Sunday or Monday, I will have enough there for at least a  
semi-decent PAW.

Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



On Oct 23, 2009, at 7:09 PM, Sonny Carter wrote:

>
>
> Most of the time, I try to have a camera with me, with a fresh  
> battery, set
> for the correct ISO, so I can be ready to be lucky if a shot comes  
> along,
> just in case, you understand.
>



In reply to: Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from h_arche at yahoo.com (H. Ball Arche) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)