Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] iso 100.000+??
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:30:08 -0700
References: <380-220091042216311315@M2W004.mail2web.com> <3cad89990910222026m45e74e8ax3c2f0bc9d834386f@mail.gmail.com>
 
#1 rule on Leica list: never question the superiority of a Leica lens,
even if it is a Rexx (a dog, get it?)!! :-)

It is also true that whatever Doug is doing or using, he is doing it
right. So no complaint from me about his choices...

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> That is only your opinion. I respect it. But I find it is interesting
> that you comment on lenses other than the one I had mentioned, but
> that is typical when people would like to justify a point of view a
> any cost.
> Cheers


-- 
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
Replies: Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
 In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)