Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/10/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] iso 100.000+??
From: dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:25:44 -0400
References: <23a0a61f0910211727j22c205e6k6594e6382ca9c0d6@mail.gmail.com><440b792d0910211759v42bbb4deh802feadf3d60ef93@mail.gmail.com> <102220090519.3930.4ADFEB610000129400000F5A223045151403010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com> <02803085CDD84C08B02024816E57B715@xyw>
Yes.
On Oct 22, 2009, at 10:07 AM, A. Lal wrote:
> Am I the only one here who remembers using K'chrome rated at ASA 10?
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <grduprey at mchsi.com>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> Why do we need iso 100,000? I seem to remember we all got along
>> just fine with iso 400 or 800. Seems like just a race to see who
>> can supply the highest iso before the next guy.
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to:
Message from simon.apekop at gmail.com (simon jessurun) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)
Message from alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] iso 100.000+??)