Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] an M9 question...
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:52:32 -0400
References: <76DF62EA-7B6E-4636-B595-8C67DB4AF929@gmail.com> <00d901ca5371$a32c9be0$e985d3a0$@net>
 
was it not the increased thickness of the camera body?

ric


On Oct 22, 2009, at 7:44 PM, Frank Filippone wrote:

> I meant to ask about something similar.....
>
> Why is the M8 and M9 VF set for a .68VF rather than the traditional . 
> 91 in
> the M3 and .72 in the M6?
>
> I have forgotten the "wisdom" of this choice......
>
> Frank Filippone
> red735i at earthlink.net
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from lucien_vd at mac.com (lucien_vd at mac.com) ([Leica] an M9 question...)
 In reply to: Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] an M9 question...)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] an M9 question...)