Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Stock Photography
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:39:25 -0500
References: <8758253.1256178888523.JavaMail.root@wamui-junio.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <C7054E1C.56F30%mark@rabinergroup.com> <004301ca52cb$33bdb5b0$9b392110$@net> <D52CF260B53B42388066FD44EBB6DEDB@syneticfeba505> <004d01ca52d5$3dfc7f70$b9f57e50$@net>

Frank - mileage does indeed vary.
One named agency requires a minimum 48 meg file (along with other  
criteria)
Ted discussed his experience with another agency.
Magnum is a stock agency (which also performs other services) with  
yet another unique set of criteria.
A premiere stock agency in the 70's, 80's and 90's, called 4x5,  
required 4x5 transparencies for their clients.
Yes. It makes perfect sense to state images size minimums and other  
technical quality standards.
Undoubtedly, as Doug has pointed out,
if you can meet those standards with equipment not mentioned on their  
lists;
you can submit work to them.
You'll notice that on the "camera list"
none of the medium format cameras appear on the list;
yet, I'm sure the images would pass their QC.

The list of agencies, each with unique criteria, is quite long.
It's pointless to bemoan the fact that you believe any particular  
agency criteria serve no purpose.
The agencies do very real business with professional photographers  
and professional image buyers.
They state their criteria based on their experience with both  
photographers and buyers.
If you want to play with a particular agency; you play by their rules.
Don't like the rules.
Don't play the game with them.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Oct 22, 2009, at 12:05 AM, Frank Filippone wrote:

> Ted, in all honesty, does it matter one iota what camera was used  
> to take
> the picture?
>
> Not the question of technical quality, just  the kind ( brand name)  
> of the
> camera.....
>
> THAT is what I rebel against.. and other, similar,  stupidities.....
>
> True.. the demands of the industry are worthless to me.....
>
> Content and quality are what counts...And I do not get that feeling  
> from the
> discussions we have had on Stock ......well maybe content for the  
> intended
> purpose of the buyer.... but certainly not quality.....
>
> YMMV... especially if you make your living from this endeavor.....
>
> Frank Filippone
> red735i at earthlink.net
> I'm so pleased you don't want to be part of this crazy stock industry
> demanding extreme quality and sizes for re-production purposes.  
> Besides as
> you say... "you're an amateur" so the high standards and demands of  
> the
> industry are worthless.
>
> Yep we all stand by the "what counts mantra..."
>>> What counts is the image and its content and its technical
> excellence......<<<
>
> Dr. ted
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Stock Photography)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Stock Photography)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Stock Photography)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Stock Photography)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Stock Photography)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Stock Photography)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Stock Photography)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Stock Photography)