Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Zeiss Normal 50mm f/2 Planar T* ZM
From: douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp)
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:26:24 +0200
References: <C6F13DFF.5608A%mark@rabinergroup.com> <4ACC5168.4060500@gmx.de> <100720091611.29088.4ACCBD9B0000C140000071A0223045151403010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com>

Gene,

I did have one problem in that respect, the front end dropped out of my 
Planar 1.7/50. 

The M42 Yashica lenses I still have actually seem to be of better build 
quality that those with CY mount.

Cheers
Douglas

grduprey at mchsi.com wrote:
>  
> Kyocera also made the excellent 80~200 Vario Elmar R lens for Leica.  
> Nothing wrong with Kyocera lenses, except they are now out of the 
> business.  However, I never thought much of the construction as far a 
> ruggedness of their Contax Zeiss offerings. 
>
>
> Gene
>
>  -------------- Original message from Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp at 
> gmx.de>: --------------
>
>
>   
>> And what, pray, is so bad about Kyocera (aka Yashica) lenses?
>>
>> In a relation performance to price, they knocked the socks off quite a 
>> few of the bigger manufacturers.
>>
>> Their CY mount 2.8/55 Macro is close to being spectacular, and the 
>> 3.5/21mm is up there with the best. The 2.8/135 Zeiss (possibly Kyocera 
>> - not sure) is also a superb lens.
>>
>> Yashica's earlier fixed-lens RFs (GSN (1.7/45), 35 GX (1.7/40), etc.) 
>> delivered superb results, even wide open
>>
>> Why does everybody still knock Yashica? - I grew up with their SLRs 
>> (Electro-X, FR, FX-D) and Contax SLRs (RTS, 137MD) long before I got my 
>> first Leica and always got great results.
>>
>> Douglas
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Mark Rabiner wrote:
>>     
>>>> Although I now shoot Leica R8 and 9, I previously shot a lot with the
>>>> Contax RX and RTSII.  The on-camera lens was always the Carl Zeiss
>>>> Planar 50/1.4.  Back then Carl Zeiss Germany and Japan used Schott
>>>> billets for their lens blanks.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Except that there was no Carl no Germany you were shooting with a Kyocera
>>> lens which is why it cost 200 bucks and not 2000.
>>>
>>>
>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>   


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Zeiss Normal 50mm f/2 Planar T* ZM)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Zeiss Normal 50mm f/2 Planar T* ZM)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Zeiss Normal 50mm f/2 Planar T* ZM)
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] Zeiss Normal 50mm f/2 Planar T* ZM)