Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]So, would you call him an emotivist? S.d. On Sep 28, 2009, at 8:55 PM, George Lottermoser wrote: > Let me rephrase. > In response to Mark's comment, "If his stuff is so bad?" > referring to LUG critics of "The National Parks." Episode One, by > Ken Burns: > > I did not refer to Episode One as "bad." > I used the terms "Burns formula," "skimming" and "hyping" > He uses his successful formula of pace, narration, time-lapse, > panning and zooming still images, to tell his story in his way. > In so doing he adds his point of view (POV) to the body of history > on his chosen subject(s). > I don't see this as necessarily "bad;" but rather as "more." > He "skims" the archives and builds a new presentation. > He's very good at what he does. > His overall approach generally tends to "hype" his chosen subject(s). > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > On Sep 28, 2009, at 5:31 PM, Greg Lorenzo wrote: > >>> This is just real hard to read, George. >> >> >> Agree, very hard to read. George is your email program formating >> your paragraphs vertically instead of horizontally? > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information