Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Ken Burns misfired - so far
From: gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:31:32 -0600
References: <3DDEC5C2-ACE3-4165-BB15-67924524ACB4@mac.com>

mark at rabinergroup.com writes:


> > Nor did I say "bad."
> > I said "formula."
> > No surprises (yet).
> > 
> > It's his story, told in his way.
> > 
> > One can expect
> > other's stories (or points of view)
> > will not be told;
> > which is why
> > I also said "skimming."
> > 
> > He's added his POV
> > in his formulaic manner
> > to the histories of his subjects.
> > 
> > Not bad.
> > Just more.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > George Lottermoser
> 
> 
> This is just real hard to read, George.


Agree, very hard to read. George is your email program formating your 
paragraphs vertically instead of horizontally?

 

Greg Lorenzo

Calgary, Canada
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Microsoft brings you a new way to search the web.  Try  Bing? now
http://www.bing.com?form=MFEHPG&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TEXT_MFEHPG_Core_tagline_try
 bing_1x1


Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Ken Burns misfired - so far)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Ken Burns misfired - so far)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Ken Burns misfired - so far)