Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Ken Burns misfired - so far
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:23:52 -0500
References: <a3f189160909280754j27b763dej534115c636fb57a2@mail.gmail.com> <C6E68D6D.55842%mark@rabinergroup.com> <a3f189160909281315s592dc4f6k8dea555746e221cf@mail.gmail.com>

Nor did I say "bad."
I said "formula."
No surprises (yet).

It's his story, told in his way.

One can expect
other's stories (or points of view)
will not be told;
which is why
I also said "skimming."

He's added his POV
in his formulaic manner
to the histories of his subjects.

Not bad.
Just more.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Sep 28, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Sonny Carter wrote:

> I didn't say Ken Burns' National Parks Documentary was bad; (maybe  
> you go to
> different cafeterias than I do.)     I go to the Piccadilly once in  
> a while
> in Shreveport.   I like the green pea salad, and the turnip greens.  I
> always have to add some pepper sauce to the greens.   They do as  
> good a job
> as anyone frying catfish fillets.  So, there ya go.
>
> I don't know If Ken shoots all the footage himself.  Maybe so.   
> Most of the
> still stuff is just pulled straight from scans.  This I know,  
> because I was
> a sous-chef in one of his cafeteria-docs a few years ago.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Mark Rabiner  
> <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
>
>>> A Ken Burns Documentary is a little bit like going to a  
>>> cafeteria.  They
>>> serve it in an attractive manner, fresh, but no pepper in the  
>>> gumbo, and
>>> someone to takes the trays to the table for you.
>>>
>>> They've used materials from our archives before, and were a tiny bit
>>> slippery in the accuracy of period the image was supposed to  
>>> portray.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Wow weird!
>> I'll go to bat for Ken Burns.
>>
>> If his stuff is so bad why are they by far the most watched things on
>> public
>> TV for the past 22.2 years?
>> Because they are so  bad and boring I'm sure is the reason.
>> He's mine and most peoples favorite documentarian.
>> - He operates his cameras himself.
>> - And its all about the power of stills.
>> Stills in motion of course.
>> The Ken Burns affect.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Mark William Rabiner
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
>
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
> http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> (+31.754164,-093.099080)
>
> USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Ken Burns misfired - so far)
In reply to: Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Ken Burns misfired - so far)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Ken Burns misfired - so far)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Ken Burns misfired - so far)