Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/09/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]For it to be f2 it would be h-u-g-e and probably dearer than the Noctilux. It was apparently discontinued because they could not make a profit on it... Frank On 16 Sep, 2009, at 17:39, red735i at earthlink.net wrote: > The 3E is a great lens, and better for Digital as it appears as 3 > FL, .... which means the user does not have to change lenses so > often..... > > Discontinuance was a mistake IMHO. > > My only negaitve is the F4 aperture. > > Why not an F2 aperture 3E? That would do a great 1 lens job with > the M9..... > > Lucien.. thanks for the marker notation... listening to 70 minutes > of interview is a bit long... > where is the Cliff Notes version? > > > Frank F> > > > > A new Tri-Elmar soon ? Minute 50:11 >> >> Lucien >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information