Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Death of PJ, revisited
From: Neil.Beddoe at mbamfunds.com (Neil Beddoe)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:02:36 +0100
References: <380-22009812423155622@M2W022.mail2web.com> <50C19006-EBDE-4335-868F-4C5AB54115FC@mac.com> <07363AE1-809E-48DC-A49E-EF047EEEA47F@frozenlight.eu> <200908251349.BVH32092@rg5.comporium.net>

Want a bet it's legal.  If The Guardian want to stitch up their suppliers by 
changing their terms, there's nothing to prevent them from doing so.  The 
tragic fact remains that very few people who read the Guardian pay more than 
cursory attention to the photographs they print.  Advertisers know this and 
won't pay extra for space in a paper with well executed photographs.



-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+neil.beddoe=mbamfunds.com at leica-users.org 
[mailto:lug-bounces+neil.beddoe=mbamfunds.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf 
Of Tina Manley
Sent: 25 August 2009 14:49
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Death of PJ, revisited

At 01:47 AM 8/25/2009, you wrote:
>I actually
>hope that Murdoch's experiment with charging for all his web content
>is successful.
>
>Nathan

Yes, he wants everybody to pay him but he doesn't want to pay for content.

"The Guardian's parent company blamed "very difficult trading 
conditions" for its decision to make a rights grab for work done by 
freelance photographers at all its papers last week. Last week 
photographers were sent an email by managing editor Chris Elliot, 
stating that GNM would indeed stop paying re-use fees from 1 
September. From then on, standard terms would grant the papers 
"perpetual licence" to re-use pictures without paying. Oliver Laurent 
of the British Journal of Photography described the move as "clear 
rights grab".

This is definitely not legal.

Tina

Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com 


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

.

This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. It may contain information which is privileged and confidential. 
Accordingly any unauthorised use is strictly prohibited. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please contact the sender as soon as possible.

It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of 
any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction, 
unless specifically agreed otherwise. All market prices, data and other 
information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are subject 
to change without notice. Any opinions or advice contained in this Internet 
email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable 
governing Marble Bar Asset Management LLP's  terms and conditions of 
business or client agreement letter. Any comments or statements made herein 
do not necessarily reflect those of Marble Bar Asset Management LLP.

Marble Bar Asset Management LLP is regulated and authorised by the FSA.


In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] Death of PJ, revisited)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Death of PJ, revisited)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Death of PJ, revisited)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Death of PJ, revisited)