Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Death of PJ, revisited
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:49:08 -0400
References: <380-22009812423155622@M2W022.mail2web.com> <50C19006-EBDE-4335-868F-4C5AB54115FC@mac.com> <07363AE1-809E-48DC-A49E-EF047EEEA47F@frozenlight.eu>

At 01:47 AM 8/25/2009, you wrote:
>I actually
>hope that Murdoch's experiment with charging for all his web content
>is successful.
>
>Nathan

Yes, he wants everybody to pay him but he doesn't want to pay for content.

"The Guardian's parent company blamed "very difficult trading 
conditions" for its decision to make a rights grab for work done by 
freelance photographers at all its papers last week. Last week 
photographers were sent an email by managing editor Chris Elliot, 
stating that GNM would indeed stop paying re-use fees from 1 
September. From then on, standard terms would grant the papers 
"perpetual licence" to re-use pictures without paying. Oliver Laurent 
of the British Journal of Photography described the move as "clear 
rights grab".

This is definitely not legal.

Tina

Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com 



Replies: Reply from Neil.Beddoe at mbamfunds.com (Neil Beddoe) ([Leica] Death of PJ, revisited)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] Death of PJ, revisited)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Death of PJ, revisited)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Death of PJ, revisited)