Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:35:57 -0700
References: <4A8328F5.4010509@san.rr.com> <523810.12285.qm@web86708.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <3cad89990908130128n384649b2u65885d7d71d0a11a@mail.gmail.com> <4A848832.3000206@san.rr.com> <3cad89990908131959k19b4c08ft49a2959c0ef7de2@mail.gmail.com>

VERY un-American.  Both concept and action.

Me too, except for the house..... which I paid off years ago.

Frank Filippone
red735i at earthlink.net


It is just that I have an old fashioned aversion to debt





In reply to: Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)