Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9?M8
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:00:43 -0500
References: <C6A9E9C7.52D0A%mark@rabinergroup.com> <p06230908c6aa3189a222@[10.0.1.199]>
 
I would guess that an optimal sample of the best digital lens
precisely coupled to an optimal sample of the P65+ back
would equal or surpass print quality
from many 8x10 negatives.

And we have photographers who are stitching
a number of those image files together
achieving quite phenomenal results.

I'm speaking purely technical performance here;
not aesthetic power.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Aug 13, 2009, at 4:33 PM, Henning Wulff wrote:

> That's why the new series have been developed. They are better.  
> They are of higher performance all around. And the only reason they  
> would not work better
Replies: Reply from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9"M8)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9 ? M8)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Hasselblad digi-backs, lenses - was M9?M8)