Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/08/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:05:03 +0530
References: <4A8328F5.4010509@san.rr.com> <523810.12285.qm@web86708.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <3cad89990908130128n384649b2u65885d7d71d0a11a@mail.gmail.com> <7ac27f4f0908130206k6255787cv84674ba8f7f95f96@mail.gmail.com> <3cad89990908130208r2ef495e0id25b1fbd738f254b@mail.gmail.com> <7ac27f4f0908130224h1637f9c2yf03e716a44f7de32@mail.gmail.com>
I mean the loan structure (--:
Cheers
Jayanand
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Richard Man <richard.lists at
gmail.com>wrote:
> A "cheap" property in the Silicon Valley is probably $500K, and that's
> probably a one bedroom condo in San Jose :-)
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj<jayanand at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > The cheaper the better upfront?
> > Cheers
>
>
>
> --
> // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
> // w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
> http://rfman.wordpress.com
> // book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to:
Message from glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?)