Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Did the "legal" analysis follow-up ever get posted? Frank Farmer Jackson, Miss. On Jun 29, 2009, at 9:36 PM, Tina Manley wrote: > Even more astounding is their follow-up after all of the comments > accusing the writer of stealing photos. They consider it "fair use" > and say that putting "all rights reserved" on a photo posted on the > internet does not give the photographer all rights. Looks like I'm > going to have to reconsider where and how I post photos. > > http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/are-flickr-photos-fair-game-for-home-printing/ > > Tina > > At 10:27 PM 6/29/2009, you wrote: >> Wow! I think this guy clearly does not understand the difference >> between fair use and theft. I am also surprised. >> >> Frank Farmer >> Jackson, Miss. >> >> On Jun 29, 2009, at 4:44 AM, Steve Unsworth wrote: >> >>> I'm surprised the NY Times haven't taken this down... >>> >>> <http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/flickr-as-an-interior-decora >>> >>> > tor-tool/?apage=5#comments> >>> >>> Sorry if it's been posted before and I've missed it. >>> >>> Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information