Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/06/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] You want some pretty photographs? Why not steal them?
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:42:55 -0400
References: <C66E4B88.623%lug@steveunsworth.co.uk> <C0DC78C2-8A2C-423A-AA49-97CF4156EDBE@comcast.net> <200906300236.BRI68792@rg4.comporium.net> <9175F3E7-80DE-4341-B8C1-D946A52749C9@comcast.net>
At 10:38 PM 6/29/2009, you wrote:
>Did the "legal" analysis follow-up ever get posted?
>
>Frank Farmer
>Jackson, Miss.
Well, if you consider her expert to be legal analysis:
http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/are-flickr-photos-fair-game-for-home-printing/
"In order to get the legal perspective on this I talked to Anthony
Falzone, a law professor at Stanford and the executive director of
the <http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/fair-use-project>Fair Use Project
there. He said that an "All rights reserved" label on a photo did not
necessarily give the photographer total control."
Slightly biased legal analysis.
Tina
Tina Manley
www.tinamanley.com
In reply to:
Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] You want some pretty photographs? Why not steal them?)
Message from summicron at comcast.net (Frank F. Farmer) ([Leica] You want some pretty photographs? Why not steal them?)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] You want some pretty photographs? Why not steal them?)
Message from summicron at comcast.net (Frank F. Farmer) ([Leica] You want some pretty photographs? Why not steal them?)