Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] No R-10
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:34:35 +1000
References: <36172e5a0906141401ie4e65ecg8916a943a072fdaa@mail.gmail.com> <C65B2A0E.63%lug@steveunsworth.co.uk>

Steve, Visoflex was only mentioned in jest during the dinner. I wouldn't bet
your house on a new design ;-)
I'm going back to the factory tomorrow and seeing many people again, plus
the customer service folks (there's a very nice story attached to that).

2009/6/15 Steve Unsworth <lug at steveunsworth.co.uk>

> This isn't aimed at you Geoff, rather a general statement.
>
> There's currently a point being put forward on the LUF, mainly by one
> individual it has to be said, about Leica needing to concentrate their R&D
> efforts on a new Visioflex for the M.
>
> Any thought about the viability of such a system? I've taken quite a
> hard-line 'you have to be joking' stance as I think it's a waste of money
> to
> attempt to resurrect a system that wasn't popular 30 years ago.
>
> Do people think such a system would sell to M users?
>
> Steve
>
>
> On 14/6/09 22:01, "Geoff Hopkinson" <hopsternew at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Some amplication to the best of my recollection:
> >
> > Stefan said that an important factor for any possible future Leica
> digital
> > camera is that Leica developed and control all of the S2 design in house.
> > When he said that Leica was unhappy with current four thirds sensor
> quality
> > (noise) and a four thirds system camera was not planned, there were
> > rumblings from the floor and he was pressed about an EVF model
> (Electronic
> > ViewFinder for those not keeping up). He did not verbally respond to a
> > quastion whether Leica could design their own sensor. He asked for a show
> of
> > hands for who would buy such a camera. Perhaps one third or the room
> raised
> > their hands. Further question on the EVF resulted on a statement that
> Leica
> > regarded the Panasonic G1 as the very lowest acceptable quality for any
> such
> > hypothetical EVF. Another Japanese electronics manufacturer (not Fuji,
> Nikon
> > or Canon) was mentioned as a possible future partner. Leica also does not
> > intend to directly compete with Canon/Nikon on dSLRs.
> > Leica is also reportedly happy with their connection with Jen Optik but
> > not Imacon.
> > The German word that Herr Daniels used for the solution for R lenses (not
> > before next Photokina, too ambitious) was ad?quat if native German
> speakers
> > care to micro dissect his meaning.
> > 2009/6/14 Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Cheers
Geoff
'Life's not B&W, except at both ends'
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman


In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] No R-10)
Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] No R-10)