Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 8 or 8.2
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 10:24:56 -0700
References: <210AE33D-07D9-462C-A5AB-3BD46B818336@embarqmail.com> <49FC8010.90800@whitedogs.co.uk> <779C4401-2392-40EE-AB35-7164E60B5758@cox.net>

On May 2, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Steve Barbour wrote:

>
> On May 2, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Mark Pope wrote:
>
>> Ric,
>>
>> Decisions, decisions...
>>
>> My first M8 was an ex-demo.  My second, which arrives in a week or  
>> so, will also be an ex-demo.  It comes with full warranty, so makes  
>> excellent sense in my humble opinion.
>>
>> The savings compared to the 8.2 are huge - even if I could afford  
>> the M8.2, I couldn't justify it on the grounds that as far as image  
>> quality is concerned, there is absolutely no difference.
>>
>> So the body covering is more grippy - get the hand grip or a thumbs- 
>> up if this is a concern.
>>
>> The quieter shutter might be nice, given that you do a lot of  
>> street photography, but personally, I don't think the M8's shutter  
>> is too intrusive.  I'm not bothered either way about the fastest  
>> shutter speed being 1/8000or 1/4000.
>>
>> The sapphire LCD glass is also nice - but I don't know how easy (or  
>> hard) it is to hurt the existing LCD cover.  I hope not to find out.
>>
>> As for the snapshot mode - it's not really appropriate on a camera  
>> like the M8 in my view, but it doesn't do any harm.  Anyway, with  
>> Auto ISO and Auto, it's virtually the same isn't it?
>>
>> As far as the precision or otherwise of the viewfinder, you do get  
>> used to it, though I must admit the 50/75mm framing is irritating  
>> sometimes.
>>
>> I also use a Canon 20D which, as everyone knows has a reflex  
>> viewfinder.  The pictures always show more than what the viewfinder  
>> shows.  I suspect that this is the case with the majority of DSLRs,  
>> with the probable exception of a few top end bodies.
>>
>> What I do know is whatever model you go for, you will make  
>> excellent use of it and I look forward to seeing the results!
>
> these are my feelings too Mark... but the 8.2 is nice, if it tempts  
> you and money is unlimited,
>
>
> Steve


btw...the 8.2 won't make you a better photographer...

I may be wrong,  so if you think so,


prove it...


Steve


>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Mark Pope,
>> Swindon, Wilts
>> UK
>>
>> Homepage               http://www.monomagic.co.uk
>> Blog                   http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog
>> Picture a week (2009)  
>> http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2009
>>              (2008) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2008
>>
>>
>> Ric Carter wrote:
>>> Is there any REALLY good reason to pass on an M8 demo and hold out  
>>> for the 8.2?
>>> ric
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] 8 or 8.2)
Message from mark at whitedogs.co.uk (Mark Pope) ([Leica] 8 or 8.2)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] 8 or 8.2)