Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well said Douglas. I find the knee jerk, negative reaction to blatant human sexuality, paradoxically, both understandable [because of cultural taboos] and odd [because of my personal appreciation of beauty]. Does anyone think this is not a a well composed rectangular frame of a beautiful young woman in her prime? I assume that if she wore jeans some, who object, would find it a beautiful photograph. So does it come down to "we're not supposed to see [or be shown] human genitals in photographs?" It's okay to photograph the horrors of war but not the beauty of sexuality and human desire? Then take the judgement so far as to judge the model a "slut?" If this image were a beautiful drawing or painting would some of the objectors have a less prudish reaction? Most painters and sculptors, we now admire as historically "best," have similar poses in their body of work. Is the photographic medium just too "real" for reality? Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On May 1, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Douglas Barry wrote: > > "Frank Filippone" <red735i at earthlink.net> wrote >> $37.5K is cheap? >> >> I am jealous... I wish I could sell some garbage photos for this >> kind of cash....... forget the topic of a nude..... >> >> I have seen a lot of stuff that I consider garbage, in collections >> like the Getty, MOMA, and others. Big prints, probably big >> bucks. I really wonder if art collectors and gallery owners, and >> Museums actually have anyone on staff that knows the difference >> between something worthwhile and something that is worthless... >> worthless in the sense of intrinsic value, qualitative value, or >> otherwise quality in general. >>>>>>>>> > > Sorry, have to disagree. > > People decide what moves them, and what to pay for it. What one > person likes may not necessarily be liked by you or I, but, for the > person who buys it, it may pull a certain string in their heart. > The fact that the price reached 37.5k was not just driven by the > image but also by the combination of the Friedlander & Ciccione > names, just as the presence of an Olympic recordholder adds lustre > & price to a sports image: a similar image of a club athlete at a > small local sports event would not necessarily have the same cachet > or price. > > Anyway, I liked the confrontational composition which we all seem > to agree was confrontational :-) > > Regards > > Douglas > _________ > Douglas Barry > Bray, Co. Wicklow > Republic of Ireland > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/DouglasBray/MiguelGeary.jpg.html > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information