Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Picture of the Year Controversy
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:36:22 -0500
References: <200904201058.BPA26179@rg5.comporium.net> <49ECBDF4.7070702@mcclary.net>

I agree.
And also suspect that
as time goes on
the "journalism" line (which most of us seem to instinctively agree on)
will continue to creep toward the spectacular
and away from the natural.
;~(
As "journalists" themselves
seem to be pushing it;
whether in the name of stock sales
or
in the name of style.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Apr 20, 2009, at 1:24 PM, Harrison McClary wrote:

> First I agree that almost all photos need "something" other than  
> the default RAW settings in Lightroom or whatever.  However;  
> looking at his photos they are way over processed.
>
> Never did I make a straight print working news, always there was  
> some burning, dodging and in B&W sometimes bleaching to get the  
> print to look like what I "saw" when I made the photo.  To expect  
> that there be a great straight shot just because we now shoot  
> digital is a little ridiculous.  I keep thinking back to my old  
> friend from my Atlanta days who got in trouble a few years ago in  
> Charlotte for his "manipulation" of digital files.  From what I saw  
> he did nothing wrong.  the intent of his photos was not altered,  
> just colors SLIGHTLY pumped and backgrounds burned down, no big  
> deal, IMHO.
>
> Now these photos in the link Tina shared look like they came from a  
> cartoon, guy really needs to learn how to tweak an image without  
> going over the top.
>
> On 4/20/09 5:58 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
>> The judges thought he used too much photoshop based on the  
>> difference between the photos he submitted and the RAW file.  The  
>> photographer argues that a RAW file is not really indicative of  
>> what the scene looks like without being converted and that the  
>> appearance of the submitted files depends on which software is used.
>
>
> -- 
> Harrison Mcclary
>
> Harrison McClary Photography
>       (615) 331-7794
>       harrison at mcclary.net
>       http://www.mcclary.net
>     ImageStockSouth:
>       Stock photography from the Southern USA
>       http://www.imagestocksouth.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Picture of the Year Controversy)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Picture of the Year Controversy)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Picture of the Year Controversy)
Message from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] Picture of the Year Controversy)