Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/04/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Picture of the Year Controversy
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:28:55 -0500
References: <200904201058.BPA26179@rg5.comporium.net> <DE913F3F-40F7-48F1-B4FC-B2FCAA22E226@mac.com> <52351E11-4D99-4676-B0D9-4F6CE499BAED@charter.net> <3E020028-661C-43B5-A965-9F355365B419@mac.com> <49EC9F37.1080908@bouncing.org>
I'm certainly not suggesting that.
As always - the questions at hand,
"where do we draw the line between:
journalism
art
self expression
visual truth?"
and
"who draws that line?"
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
On Apr 20, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Philip Clarke wrote:
> So we should ban monochrome, submit only raw files, and leave the
> printing to the (now defunct) Ilford awards. That'll sort the men out
> from the boys. (save a ton of paper too, very eco-friendly)
Replies:
Reply from nod at bouncing.org (Philip Clarke) ([Leica] Picture of the Year Controversy)
In reply to:
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Picture of the Year Controversy)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Picture of the Year Controversy)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] Picture of the Year Controversy)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Picture of the Year Controversy)
Message from nod at bouncing.org (Philip Clarke) ([Leica] Picture of the Year Controversy)