Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Picture of the Year Controversy
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:51:14 -0700
References: <200904201058.BPA26179@rg5.comporium.net> <DE913F3F-40F7-48F1-B4FC-B2FCAA22E226@mac.com>
 
Order of historicity, and accepted community standards for BW  
imagery, trumps that connection.
S.d.


On Apr 20, 2009, at 8:43 AM, George Lottermoser wrote:

> Interesting question.
> Is black and white (removal of all color) more highly manipulated  
> than highly manipulated color?
> On one level - one would have to answer, "yes."
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
> On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:58 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
>
>> Conversion to B&W - the ultimate in manipulation?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Picture of the Year Controversy)
 In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Picture of the Year Controversy)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Picture of the Year Controversy)