Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: CV 15/4.5 in Nikon F Mount
From: len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:10:54 -0400
References: <380-22009313016325154@M2W021.mail2web.com> <20A5FCC7-6D9A-4D20-8A7B-543F84FEDDC2@verizon.net> <000301c9b15c$2ab5b9b0$80212d10$@net> <55CA50E0-483A-4A51-9FD7-D0DD08CB0D9D@verizon.net> <p06230907c5f6b747d9b7@[10.0.1.199]>

Henning,

Thanks for the info on the 15mm/3.5. I knew about the flare but  
really wanted a wide angle that gave me straight lines. I knew you  
liked your Sigma 12-24mm. That I can try at my camera shop. With  
today's low noise sensors f11 should not be a problem.

Thanks,
Len


On Mar 30, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Henning Wulff wrote:

> At 1:45 PM -0400 3/30/09, Leonard Taupier wrote:
>> The 13mm, the two 15mm's and the 18mm are retrofocus rectilinears  
>> and can be used on todays digital bodies. The old 10mm that you  
>> remember is a fisheye and requires the mirror lock up. I have been  
>> tracking the prices of these wide angle lenses and am thinking  
>> about getting the 15mm f3.5. It has no distortion where the new  
>> AFS 14-24mm zoom has some barrel at 14mm. The AF 14mm has a lot of  
>> distortion and vignetting on a digital FF body.  The 13mm is very  
>> rare and if you find one may cost thousands. A clean 15mm is  
>> between $900 and $1200 which is why I perked up at Chris's post.  
>> However I couldn't find the CV 15 F mount on Gandy's site either.
>>
>> Len
>>
>>
>
>
> Hi Len,
>
> I still have my 15/3.5 Nikkor, and while it's quite decent I  
> wouldn't get too excited about it. It has very little distortion,  
> but it's not zero either, and it does have flare issues. When the  
> 14's came out in the 90's I looked at them but decided that none  
> were that great in comparison so never got one.
>
> Now I have a 12-24 Sigma for my FF Canons and am reasonably happy  
> with that. As with all Sigmas, QC is terrible but mine works  
> reasonably and I'm able to get images with no more, and generally  
> less distortion than the 15 Nikkor, and a lot less flare. The only  
> thing is that for good quality I have to shoot at f/11 or so.
>
> -- 
>
>    *            Henning J. Wulff
>   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
>  /###\   mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
>  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] OT: CV 15/4.5 in Nikon F Mount)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] OT: CV 15/4.5 in Nikon F Mount)
Message from len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] OT: CV 15/4.5 in Nikon F Mount)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] OT: CV 15/4.5 in Nikon F Mount)
Message from len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] OT: CV 15/4.5 in Nikon F Mount)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] OT: CV 15/4.5 in Nikon F Mount)