Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]here's a couple of wide-opens with the Voigtlander 28/1.9 one dark, one light http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/shino/voigt/L8663140-2.jpg.html http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/shino/L8661452.jpg.html -rei On Mar24 19:31, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote: > The f1.9 had a tendency to flare. > The whites were a bit washed out. > The images were just never that crisp. > Almost like shooting with a Noctilux:-) > I like a little bit of bite in my contrast, Summilux style! > S.d. > > On Mar 24, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Pasvorn Boonmark wrote: > >> Hi Slobodan, >> >> Is there any particular preference on f/3.5 v.s. f/1.9? >> >> Weight and size? >> >> Thanks, >> -Pasvorn >> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Slobodan Dimitrov >> <s.dimitrov at charter.net> wrote: >>> Couldn't agree with that more! >>> Though I have a 21mm for my LTM kit, it does feel somewhat naked >>> without >>> that 28mm. >>> Now if they only would make a 25mm, which coupled to the RF, I'd be >>> in pig >>> heaven. >>> By the way, I preferred the 3.5f over the 1.9f. >>> S.d. >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Rei Shinozuka shino at panix.com Ridgewood, New Jersey