Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The f1.9 had a tendency to flare. The whites were a bit washed out. The images were just never that crisp. Almost like shooting with a Noctilux:-) I like a little bit of bite in my contrast, Summilux style! S.d. On Mar 24, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Pasvorn Boonmark wrote: > Hi Slobodan, > > Is there any particular preference on f/3.5 v.s. f/1.9? > > Weight and size? > > Thanks, > -Pasvorn > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Slobodan Dimitrov > <s.dimitrov at charter.net> wrote: >> Couldn't agree with that more! >> Though I have a 21mm for my LTM kit, it does feel somewhat naked >> without >> that 28mm. >> Now if they only would make a 25mm, which coupled to the RF, I'd >> be in pig >> heaven. >> By the way, I preferred the 3.5f over the 1.9f. >> S.d. >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information