Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]To me this is a scan of a size (1701 x 2048) which has some meaning; Unlike 99.9 of the posts of the lug which has people saying: "this lens took this picture ant that lens took that picture" Then people I assume run out and buy the lens having seen the shot. With rez good for a postage stamp. Could have been done with a cardboard throw away digital camera. Once they start making them. Looking at this image I get what I think is a real feel for the lens; What it can do. Its real exciting and a real pleasure to behold. Is it the sharpest lens in the history of photography? I think so. I'm looking at eye lashes; Individual ones, you can count them. And the split ends at the ends of them Indoors wide open hand held. That's sharp. Mark William Rabiner > From: Jeff Moore <jbm at jbm.org> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:57:19 -0400 > To: <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: [Leica] Another 75mm-Summilux-on-M8 example > > Just grabbed this one last night. > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/jbm0/3358536031/sizes/o/ > > (Sure, it's handheld in room light at ISO 1250, so it's nothing like as > preternaturally detailed as that frame Tina showed; but this shows the > lens's usefulness for the way I've been working). > > This is part of the WFMU set I already pimped, so you needn't follow the > link if you've already been there. > > By the way, about the M8 at 1250 -- does it seem to anyone else that > high ISOs look a lot better than they did when the camera was released? > I'm thinking they've done some firmware magic or something. > > -Jeff > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information