Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Howard I read those articles too and had the same thoughts. Sometimes I wonder if we interpret these statements too literally. Would be fascinating to know the full story. More importantly it is an impressive example of the new zoom's performance. You are a courageous husband though publishing Esther's photo enlargeable to individual skin pore level! If you suffer husbandicide due to Esther looking at this, can I have your cameras? 2009/3/21 H&ECummer <cummer at netvigator.com> > Hi Luggers, > I am continuing to play with Esther's G1 and the newly acquired 45 - 200 > Lumix zoom > Here is a picture of Esther, long suffering wife and photo subject of 40 > years, > taken with the Lumix zoom set at 84mm, f4.5 @ 1/125, processed in CS4. > > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Howard+Cummer/Lumix+45+-+200+Zoom/EsBW.JPG.html > > http://tinyurl.com/ce2vdu > > In an interview posted on Digital Review, Panasonic states that the G1 > performed > in camera lens corrections when using Lumix lenses. > > http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09031901panasonicinterview.asp > > Panasonic points out that Leica doesn't allow them to do digital correction > on Leica lenses so there > are no Leica lenses for the Micro 4/3rds system. > > > Please look at the photo enlarged. > C&C always welcome. > Cheers > Howard > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Cheers Geoff 'Life's too short for mediocre glass' http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/a/ http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman