Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] With the Summicron Collaps. and TX
From: luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Tue Feb 24 15:01:19 2009
References: <C5C8FAF0.4A4CC%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Hi Mark,

I understand and I agree, my original images are bigger than these, if  
I no see a sharp image on my 24" screen I never do it because if one  
day I want to do a decent print will be horrible. Up to now I've  
resized my images at a small dimmension for posting, and I think that  
this is the only way to upload no so much heavy images.

Saludos cordiales
Lluis


El 24/02/2009, a las 7:16, Mark Rabiner escribi?:

> The top one I see is a 950 by 655 pixel file.
> If you printed it at 300 dpi that's only a 2x3 inch image!
> 5 by 7 and a half centimeters isn't such a heck of a lot.
> We're looking at or comparing what?
> Signatures?
> ???
> We always see this I don't know what we can get out of files which  
> are a
> small decimal point of a normal shooting sized image.
> We're going to buy a 1000 dollar lens over a 3000 dollar lens or  
> visa versa
> after looking at an image 950 by 655 pixels across?
>
> If those were my needs I'd be out trying to find the lowest rez  
> cheapest
> point and shoot there is.
> To me this level of comparisons do not relate to Leica buying.
> And this happens on this list all the time.
>
> The smallest file size of the cheapest digital camera money can buy  
> is what
> ten times this size?
>
> I think we need to be realistic about what can be showed and not  
> shown on
> the internet.
> What does Leica do? They let you download some real life sized  
> images before
> you plunk down your thousands.
> As does nikon. And I'm sure Canon.
>
>
> Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
>> From: Lluis Ripoll <luisripoll@telefonica.net>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 01:42:24 +0100
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Subject: [Leica] With the Summicron Collaps. and TX
>>
>> These ones with M3, summicron Collapsible 50m, and Tri X, you can
>> compare the different signatures Zeiss and Leica
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/09020102.jpg.html
>> http://tinyurl.com/c4bdz2
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/09020101.jpg.html
>> http://tinyurl.com/bl52qr
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/09020112.jpg.html
>> http://tinyurl.com/ckffyt
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/09020110.jpg.html
>> http://tinyurl.com/b9c6e8
>>
>> Thanks for looking, your c & c are wellcome
>>
>> Saludos cordiales
>> lluis
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] With the Summicron Collaps. and TX)