Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>From the article: >"The Home Office added that anyone accused under the act could defend >themselves by proving they had "a reasonable excuse" for taking the >picture." This looks like the opposite of the "innocent until proven guilty" concept; the accused has to prove his/her innocence rather then the government proving them guilty! Alan Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer UPAA POY 1978 University Information Technology Services University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/