Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Feb 14, 2009, at 5:31 PM, Gerry Walden wrote: > As a UK photographer who has often photographed the police on riot > control etc. I find this proposal frightening. Whilst I am in favour > of anything that stops a terrorist carry out any of their actions, > it does mean that anybody who photographs a police officer can be > guilty of an offence because any image showing a police officers > face (or any other identifiable mark) could be of use to terrorists, > and their have already been instances of photographers being > arrested, questioned and having their cards wiped. The mere fact > that you are arrested means that they can fingerprint you and dna > test you in this country, which already has the greatest number of > cctv cameras per head of population of anywhere in the world. I think we must all reflect on the outcome of terrorist actions on your country and mine, and ask simply, "how in the world all of this has come about...?" Steve > > > Gerry > > Gerry Walden > +44 (0)23 8046 3076 > www.gerrywalden.co.uk > www.stockuk.co.uk > > On 15 Feb 2009, at 00:04, Walt Johnson wrote: > >> Sounds like the beginning of the end to me.... >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information