Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Is the DOF using a digital sensor any different than thatof film?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Sat Feb 7 05:57:53 2009
References: <BLU0-SMTP504288C23B0AA68D8D767D8CC00@phx.gbl> <9b678e0902051925v4dd7d486pd58bff41a6434fae@mail.gmail.com> <BLU0-SMTP472FC431CEE402999C8AAB8CC10@phx.gbl> <4cfa589b0902061752h78cf5434t1463edeebf766efd@mail.gmail.com> <F46DBF5D-217F-4700-B586-0548289A497C@mac.com> <328D0131D1C4477ABF8F1E596F2EBF75@jimnichols> <5DF476A4-3966-4483-9422-72118350C227@mac.com> <CD6A702A-8C56-4477-88A9-41DB82BC4DB5@mac.com> <p06230901c5b2f60ddd29@[10.0.1.199]>

Henning,

No. Never "used" a Sinar. Played with them in other's studios.

My experience with format changes goes more like this:
8x10 back on Deardorf (or at one time Calumet).
Focus on scene.
Feels too wide.
Put 5x7 back on Camera.
Feels right.
No change in focus, distance from subject or DOF.
Just a smaller section from the image circle.

I also realize that
if you want to achieve
the same composition or field of view,
with the same lens on different formats,
things change a great deal:
distance from subject,
distance between lens and plane of focus,
then, of course, effective DOF,
as well as the apparent perspective.

Seems like two different ways to think about DOF.
Both correct and useful in their own ways.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Feb 7, 2009, at 2:29 AM, Henning Wulff wrote:

> George, you've used a Sinar, haven't you? On the depth of field  
> scale, attached to the rear fine focus adjustment, the DoF scales  
> are there for 4x5 or 5x7 or 8x10, or there is a combination scale.  
> They're different for each format.


Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Is the DOF using a digital sensor any different than thatof film?)
In reply to: Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Is the DOF using a digital sensor any different than that of film?)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Is the DOF using a digital sensor any different than that of film?)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Is the DOF using a digital sensor any different than that of film?)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Is the DOF using a digital sensor any different than that of film?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Is the DOF using a digital sensor any different than that of film?)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Is the DOF using a digital sensor any different than thatof film?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Is the DOF using a digital sensor any different than thatof film?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Is the DOF using a digital sensor any different than thatof film?)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Is the DOF using a digital sensor any different than thatof film?)