Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jan 29, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Steve Unsworth wrote: > No, but I've used a 50mm Summicron at f5.6/f8. > > The first three rows on this page were 5D and various lenses... > > http://www.steveunsworth.co.uk/Albums/2006_Misc/index1.htm > > Plus from memory all of the images on this page... > > http://www.steveunsworth.co.uk/Albums/2006_Misc/index2.htm > > > As I say, I used this technique for a couple of years with the 5D. > Sorry to > hear your experience was different. it seems that way Steve... but I am not sure... it seems that if you don't stop down much, you don't overexpose much, and the images esp RAW are fixable... but you are talking about a minor problem, with no compensation except at the end processing stage, it seems that your mileage differs, maybe it is attenuated by not stopping down much, but it appears to quantitatively/maybe qualitatively differ from other Canon 5D/leica R lens users... Steve > > > Steve > > > On 29/1/09 21:55, "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@cox.net> wrote: > >> oh...really ... >> >> >> that I find surprising unless you stopped down very little... >> >> it certainly does not work for me once I stop down beyond one stop or >> two... >> >> >> have you ever shot for instance an R lux 80mm 1.4 at f4 or f 5.6 or >> slower? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information