Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]L1 + Leitz extender x 2 + Angenieux 70 x3 at 210. f.3.5. Shot against the light, this is a huge crop. I then adjusted light in order to get the bird other than 'all black'. I think this one is from the JPEG straight from the camera as I didn't use RAW much at the time. Now, as to bokeh, I guess the Angie is the cause of it all. And the extender the reason why it is 'bad bokeh' in the end, even though one may like the shot. Thanks for viewing Philippe . Barney Quinn wrote: > > I really like this shot.I am trying to figure out how yo did it. > > Barney > > On Jan 20, 2009, at 4:33 PM, Philippe AMARD wrote: > >> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/84020-1/Bokeh-Woogie-w.jpg >> >> Phx >> >> >> >> Seth Rosner wrote: >> >>> I simply cannot resist: >>> >>> If you knew bokeh, like I know bokeh, >>> oh, oh, oh what a gel >>> >>> -or- >>> >>> gimme a little bokeh, will you, huh? >>> gimme a little bokeh, will you, huh? >>> >>> -or- >>> >>> ya gotta have a lot of bokeh, >>> 'cause bokeh means good ............ >>> >>> he's lost it again, gals and guys >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippe AMARD" >>> <philippe.amard@tele2.fr> >>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:04 PM >>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Bokeh yes >>> >>> >>>> Hi Jim, >>>> >>>> here again I love it - my sort of bokeh - even if the circles are >>>> whiter >>>> on the outer of the circleagainst accepted definition - probably Mark >>>> among many maight not like it as not creamy enough, or at all? - >>>> yet it >>>> does work for me. >>>> Thanks for sharing >>>> Amicalement >>>> Philippe >>>> >>>> >>>> Jim Nichols wrote: >>>> >>>>> Alan, >>>>> >>>>> Expensive lenses are not the only ones that produce nice bokeh. >>>>> This >>>>> image was made in 1963 with a forgotten SLR, and was found when I >>>>> was >>>>> scanning negatives from my collection of cigar boxes. It was >>>>> probably >>>>> a Petri or an early Contax model. >>>>> >>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Cigar+Box/Donna+_amp_ >>>>> +Tommy+63+sm.jpg.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jim Nichols >>>>> Tullahoma, TN USA >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Magayne-Roshak" >>>>> <amr3@uwm.edu> >>>>> To: "lug" <lug@leica-users.org> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:44 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Bokeh yes >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 Douglas Nygren <dnygr@cshore.com>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Bokeh has caught my fancy of late. >>>>>>> I'm sure this has been discussed and that there is a diversity of >>>>>>> opinion. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd be interested in learnng which lenses you all feel have the >>>>>>> best >>>>>>> bokeh and why, of course. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Best--Doug >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ================================================================== >>>>>> =========== >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> ----------- >>> >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.10/1904 - Release Date: >>> 1/20/2009 7:49 AM >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >