Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] PayPal and Postal Insurance question
From: alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal)
Date: Sun Jan 11 22:28:30 2009
References: <200901110749.n0B7mYCl018826@server1.waverley.reid.org> <BE317997-633A-49A6-AD37-EDA7D88FC994@netvigator.com>

Hi Howard,

Yes, this is what I thought too. I recall there was a Lugger who lost a 
bundle on a sale because he did not have signature confirmation. So now I 
insist on insurance and signature confirmation on all paypal transactions.

Did you have proof of mailing for your parcel? If so, why did  paypal not 
accept that you had done your duty and the missing parcel was not your 
fault?

Regards,
Akhil
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "H&ECummer" <cummer@netvigator.com>
To: <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, 11 January, 2009 9:00 AM
Subject: [Leica] PayPal and Postal Insurance question


> Akhil,
> DON'T DO IT!!!!!
> I sold a mint Nikon F4 with full packing via Ebay to a buyer in Greece 
> who requested the cheapest shipping and no insurance.
> Needless to say he claimed the camera never arrived and complained to 
> EBay and I had to refund him his money and then he gave me a bad rating.
> Don't do it.
> Howard
>
>> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:05:34 -0500
>> From: "A. Lal" <alal@duke.poly.edu>
>> Subject: [Leica] Paypal and Postal Insurance Question
>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> What is paypal's policy on refunds for shipments damaged or lost in 
>> transit
>> for which proof of mailing exists?
>>
>> Just to clarify, a prospective buyer of one of the lenses I  advertised, 
>> not
>> a lugger, thought that 16 odd dollars was too much money to ship a  lens
>> across the country, even if it included signature confirmation, 
>> insurance,
>> and first-class postage with plenty of padding in the box.  He wants  to 
>> save
>> a few pennies (no, I don't know why)  and wants the lens shipped  without
>> insurance. I have no problem with this as long as paypal does not  debit 
>> my
>> account for a lens that goes missing through no fault of my own.
>>
>> If this were an old fashioned transaction via cheque  or money order  I 
>> would
>> go ahead, but with paypal involved, I believe it is best to be  cautious 
>> and
>> seek advice from this group.
>>
>> Comments are appreciated.
>>
>> BTW, in many years of buying and selling on the web, this is the  first 
>> time
>> a buyer has actually requested a no-insurance shipment in order to  save 
>> a
>> few dollars. Perhaps this should raise a red flag? Of course, I can  just
>> cover the cost of insurance myself, but the whole thing sounded a bit
>> strange.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Akhil
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 


In reply to: Message from cummer at netvigator.com (H&ECummer) ([Leica] PayPal and Postal Insurance question)