Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] FILM VS DIGITAL! ???
From: crbirchenhall at googlemail.com (Christopher Birchenhall)
Date: Sun Jan 11 14:32:48 2009
References: <3820962.1231553378917.JavaMail.root@mswamui-bichon.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <79pc8o$1r56sp@pd6mo1no-svcs.prod.shaw.ca>

Ted

Thanks for your message. Digital is good but film is not dead. For
most Leica uers it is currently the only way reasonable to maintain
full frame at the moment and there is still an excellent selection of
film out there.

Chris B

2009/1/11 Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca>:
> Hi Crew,
>
> I've just taken a break from scanning roughly 250 35mm TMY negatives rated
> at ASA 800 from one of my medical books. And making 13 X 19 size prints for
> an exhibition.
>
>
>
> A very interesting project even though I've scanned lots of slides and B&W
> negs in the past this episode is an eye opener to say the least.
>
>
>
> If I were to say ."shooting digital is an idiots way of photography" it
> would be ridiculous. It isn't! It's just a different fashion of recording
> our images. Is it better? NOPE!!! Certainly not when you look at these
> prints from film! Actually never thought I'd say or admit something like
> this.
>
>
>
> But they are different, basically it comes down to this, "To each his own!"
> There's no point knocking ones brains out comparing and trying to say one 
> is
> better than the other. Because quite frankly right now I'd have no problem
> saying, "digital just doesn't cut it like film!" But that would be
> ridiculous, as I have 13 X 19 prints from digital images that would knock
> yer socks off.
>
>
>
> But there surely is a difference when you see these prints because they 
> look
> better than wet tray prints and I always prided myself at being a pretty
> good printer when the situation called for it! I'm using an EPSON 2200
> printer with EPSON "Ultra Smooth Fine Art Paper" and they have the look and
> feel of  well made wet tray prints.. only better! But it's got to be the
> film that's making them look so cool! The Scanner is a "Polaroid 
> Sprintscan"
> film scanner. At 4000 dpi.
>
>
>
> So for what it's worth if any are interested a kind of new discovery on my
> part.
>
>
>
> The plan is.. "Never shoot film and digital" on the same assignment and
> expect to have identical looking print images! FWIW!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
>
> Ol' doc ted :-)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto@earthlink.net) ([Leica] IMG: Hoppies in Yosemite, the last photo set)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] FILM VS DIGITAL! ???)