Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 24mm - too close to 28mm?
From: imagist3 at (Lottermoser George)
Date: Sat Jan 3 14:44:31 2009
References: <> <2331F289DAD2464684A8693F4C5F4E69@dadquad> <>

24 mm = 24 mm
21 mm = 21 mm
28 mm = 28 mm

only the image area changes from 35mm film to M8 sensor

why don't people say, "hey the 45 mm isn't really a 45 mm and the 90  
mm isn't really a 90 mm on the xPan."

i'm smiling - really - i am

Fond regards,

On Jan 3, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Philippe AMARD wrote:

> so 24 is not 24, and 21 is not ...;

In reply to: Message from mark at (Mark Pope) ([Leica] 24mm - too close to 28mm?)
Message from hoppyman at (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] 24mm - too close to 28mm?)
Message from philippe.amard at (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] 24mm - too close to 28mm?)