Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]George, I like your suggested title and am coming to be inclined in favor of 'Leica for leicaholics' - id est: 100% Leica. Seth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lottermoser George" <imagist3@mac.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 11:17 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] 100 years of Leica > "100 Years of Leica" > sounds like a history title. > > "In Celebration of a Century" ? > > In any event - it would seem that > a celebration of 100 year anniversary of Leica > would demand 100% Leica gear > > Fond regards, > George > > george@imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > On Jan 2, 2009, at 12:57 PM, JamesR.Nelon wrote: > >> Alistair, >> >> I'm in - and will help wherever you need. >> >> I agree with Tina. Here's my argument for 100% Leica content: >> >> What ultimately qualifies for a Leica image? Simply a Leica UV >> filter on a >> C** or N** or other body and lens. I don't think so. What about a >> Leica lens >> on a C** or N** body? That's only part way there - almost an >> admission that >> Leica bodies don't make the cut (which can be argued). What about a >> C** or >> N** lens on a Leica body (huh?). That doesn't make much sense >> either since >> the total product is not Leica. Leica's 100th anniversary deserves the >> respect and honor of all Leica. That's what the celebration is all >> about. >> Not sharing the achievement of a superior image with any other >> system. Just >> my 2 cents. >> >> Jim Nelon >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: lug-bounces+jnelon=netvigator.com@leica-users.org >> [mailto:lug-bounces+jnelon=netvigator.com@leica-users.org] On >> Behalf Of Tina >> Manley >> Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 10:30 AM >> To: Leica Users Group >> Subject: RE: [Leica] 100 years of Leica >> >> At 01:10 AM 1/2/2009, you wrote: >> >>> Body? Maybe whatever? Or it should be mandatory body also. >>> >>> ted >> >> For 100 years of Leica, I would think 100% Leica. >> >> JMHO - >> >> Tina >> >> Tina Manley >> www.tinamanley.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.2/1872 - Release Date: 1/2/2009 1:10 PM