Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Alistair, I'm in - and will help wherever you need. I agree with Tina. Here's my argument for 100% Leica content: What ultimately qualifies for a Leica image? Simply a Leica UV filter on a C** or N** or other body and lens. I don't think so. What about a Leica lens on a C** or N** body? That's only part way there - almost an admission that Leica bodies don't make the cut (which can be argued). What about a C** or N** lens on a Leica body (huh?). That doesn't make much sense either since the total product is not Leica. Leica's 100th anniversary deserves the respect and honor of all Leica. That's what the celebration is all about. Not sharing the achievement of a superior image with any other system. Just my 2 cents. Jim Nelon -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jnelon=netvigator.com@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jnelon=netvigator.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Tina Manley Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 10:30 AM To: Leica Users Group Subject: RE: [Leica] 100 years of Leica At 01:10 AM 1/2/2009, you wrote: >Body? Maybe whatever? Or it should be mandatory body also. > >ted For 100 years of Leica, I would think 100% Leica. JMHO - Tina Tina Manley www.tinamanley.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information