Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/01/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think you originally posted it as being like a Miro painting. When I first looked I thought 'Nah, not a Miro', and didn't look any further. Looking at it again I'd say it suffers from lack of detail, and lack of focus (for want of a better word). In other words, it's not clear where we should be looking because there's so much going on. On the one hand there are the major structures of the 3 outcrops - one of which is cropped, so it doesn't really satisfy one's expectations; on the other hand, there are the penguins. They are too small to get any real detail, but they fight against the composition of the outcrops. So, yes - too messy and confusing about sums it up. It's interesting, but it seems to fall between two stools, wanting to be abstract and geometrical, but also wanting to be a nature shot. > > My landscapes have been getting a few nice comments, but this > one did not: > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alastair/album184/2008/IceSca > pe-5.jpg.html > > and I thought it might be a "dodgy" one, so please don't hold > back. Why doesn't it work? Is it just too messy and > confusing? Sink the boots, I'm planning to be more critical > this year with my own and others work, as I think we all > learn more that way. > > Cheers and Happy new year > > Alastair > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >