Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Back when Nikon first produced their film scanners with ED lenses there was a comparison review which showed a surprising superiority for the larger scanner. The explanation at the time was that it had a notably superior lens... Frank On 27 Dec, 2008, at 22:01, Diffraction Photography wrote: > Hi, > > I'm new to this list and don't mean to hijack this thread but it > seems relevant to my current dilemma. I'm considering the Nikon > 5000ED and the 9000ED. I shoot mostly 35mm but I also shoot 120 > film so one would think the choice would be simple. I've read a lot > of reviews and comparisons and I have asked many opinions but I'm > still stuck as I would only like to purchase 1 scanner, not 2. > Ultimately I am wondering about the experiences of people here with > the inconveniences, quality and effienciency of scanning 35mm film > w/ the 9000ED vs using the 5000ED. I don't plan on buying the multi- > roll feeder. > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information