Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion
From: diffraction.ca at gmail.com (Diffraction Photography)
Date: Sat Dec 27 14:02:02 2008
References: <23A7D1E76319444BA96F159496DDF4BB@dadquad> <C57B4CBF.47294%mark@rabinergroup.com> <734A5221B8C748978BBF77A073566F7F@dadquad> <974CC2F9-1381-46AA-9A5D-18F1A50FA5A6@verizon.net>
 
Hi,

I'm new to this list and don't mean to hijack this thread but it seems  
relevant to my current dilemma.  I'm considering the Nikon 5000ED and  
the 9000ED.   I shoot mostly 35mm but I also shoot 120 film so one  
would think the choice would be simple.  I've read a lot of reviews  
and comparisons and I have asked many opinions but I'm still stuck as  
I would only like to purchase 1 scanner, not 2.  Ultimately I am  
wondering about the experiences of people here with the  
inconveniences, quality and effienciency of scanning 35mm film w/ the  
9000ED vs using the 5000ED.  I don't plan on buying the multi-roll  
feeder.
Replies: Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)
Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)
Reply from len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)
Reply from pjleeson at mchsi.com (Philip Leeson) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)
Reply from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)
 In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)
Message from len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Film Scanner Suggestion)