Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Was 6x17 lust, now Noblex Oblige
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Sat Dec 27 18:41:43 2008
References: <3e7573d40812270833n6b9949d7p987935228957894e@mail.gmail.com><C57C0996.472E7%mark@rabinergroup.com> <D46ED3DD0A21437CB2682B002AE96E31@dadquad> <001901c96878$06ae24d0$6401a8c0@frontenachouse>

I've rented the Noblex to shoot conventions. Very clear, and sharp on  
Fuji 800.
I've used a chinese version also. Stay away from those. I sent mine  
back to the dealer, as it did have problems with the travel, which  
were visible in the sky areas when I used it outdoors. Indoors at  
slower speeds it did better.
By the way, most samples from the Fuji that I've seen were always  
very poor. Images from a Linhof always surpassed the Fuji shots. The  
LInhof out rents the Fuji by a very, very wide margin.
sd


On Dec 27, 2008, at 3:08 PM, <editor@frontenachouse.com>  
<editor@frontenachouse.com> wrote:

> Does anyone in the group have experience with the Noblex cameras,  
> in particularly the model 150? While the 6 x 12 format yields a  
> less extreme aspect ratio (1:2 instead of 1:3) the curved platen  
> and revolving lens seem to make a wider angle of  acceptance than  
> the 617 cameras.  I'm wondering about reliability, and about  
> distortion.  Anyone have any thoughts on the subject?  /David
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoff Hopkinson"  
> <hoppyman@bigpond.net.au>
> To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2008 3:49 PM
> Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Leica] 6x17 lust
>
>
>> Have you guys not considered the Fotoman cameras? No view camera type
>> movements, but well reported bodies that are made in a variety of  
>> formats.
>> Here at least they seem relatively inexpensive vs. the other  
>> makes. I keep
>> lusting after the 4x5 version, but I know that I don't have the  
>> dedication
>> to get the best from it.
>> http://www.fotomancamera.com/
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>> Geoff
>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
>> Pick up your camera and make the best photo you can.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Leica] 6x17 lust
>>
>> This may be the way to go.
>> Shen-Hao 6x17 Roll Film Back
>> http://www.kgcphoto.com/Reviews_&_Tutorials/shen-hao_6x17_back.htm
>> $545 from hong kong says a guy.
>>
>>
>> Mark William Rabiner
>>
>>
>>
>>> From: leo wesson <leowesson@gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>> Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:33:15 -0600
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Leica] 6x17 lust
>>>
>>> george, you know the red is coming in a 6x17.
>>>
>>> http://www.largeformatphotography.info/forum/showthread.php? 
>>> t=42809&pa
>>> ge=2
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Lottermoser George
>> <imagist3@mac.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Did the BigShot ever make it into production?
>>>> It seemed always about to appear.
>>>>
>>>> Fond regards,
>>>> George
>>>>
>>>> george@imagist.com
>>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 27, 2008, at 9:05 AM, lindnich@tesco.net wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  There was once the bigshot:
>>>> http://www.epi-centre.com/reports/9604cs.html
>>>>> BWs Gordon
>>>>>
>>>>> Saturday, December 27, 2008, 1:29:54 PM, you wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> MR> Any 2 and a 1/4 square camera a Rolleiflex or old Hasselblad
>>>>> MR> would be
>>>>> twice
>>>>> MR> the frame size of the S2 only shooting film instead of just a
>>>>> MR> capture
>>>>> area.
>>>>>
>>>>> MR> There does not seem to be a medium format system like the
>>>>> MR> traditional Hasselblad in which a digital back you'd get  
>>>>> for it
>>>>> MR> is very close at
>>>>> all to
>>>>> MR> 2 1/4 square. Though some are  hyped as "full frame" digital.
>>>>> Referring to
>>>>> MR> full frame 645 not 6x6. And not even that.
>>>>> MR> 6x6 =  2 and a 1/4 square
>>>>> MR> Its 6 cm
>>>>>
>>>>> MR> Mark William Rabiner
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>>> information
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Leo Wesson
>>> Photographer/Videographer
>>> 817.733.9157
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] 6x17 lust)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 6x17 lust)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] 6x17 lust)
Message from editor at frontenachouse.com (editor@frontenachouse.com) ([Leica] Was 6x17 lust, now Noblex Oblige)