Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 6x17 lust
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Sat Dec 27 14:50:01 2008
References: <3e7573d40812270833n6b9949d7p987935228957894e@mail.gmail.com> <C57C0996.472E7%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Have you guys not considered the Fotoman cameras? No view camera type
movements, but well reported bodies that are made in a variety of formats.
Here at least they seem relatively inexpensive vs. the other makes. I keep
lusting after the 4x5 version, but I know that I don't have the dedication
to get the best from it.
http://www.fotomancamera.com/ 


Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
Pick up your camera and make the best photo you can.

-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Leica] 6x17 lust

This may be the way to go.
Shen-Hao 6x17 Roll Film Back
http://www.kgcphoto.com/Reviews_&_Tutorials/shen-hao_6x17_back.htm
$545 from hong kong says a guy.


Mark William Rabiner



> From: leo wesson <leowesson@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:33:15 -0600
> To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Leica] 6x17 lust
> 
> george, you know the red is coming in a 6x17.
> 
> http://www.largeformatphotography.info/forum/showthread.php?t=42809&pa
> ge=2
> 
> 
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Lottermoser George
<imagist3@mac.com>wrote:
> 
>> Did the BigShot ever make it into production?
>> It seemed always about to appear.
>> 
>> Fond regards,
>> George
>> 
>> george@imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 27, 2008, at 9:05 AM, lindnich@tesco.net wrote:
>> 
>>  There was once the bigshot: 
>> http://www.epi-centre.com/reports/9604cs.html
>>> BWs Gordon
>>> 
>>> Saturday, December 27, 2008, 1:29:54 PM, you wrote:
>>> 
>>> MR> Any 2 and a 1/4 square camera a Rolleiflex or old Hasselblad 
>>> MR> would be
>>> twice
>>> MR> the frame size of the S2 only shooting film instead of just a 
>>> MR> capture
>>> area.
>>> 
>>> MR> There does not seem to be a medium format system like the 
>>> MR> traditional Hasselblad in which a digital back you'd get for it 
>>> MR> is very close at
>>> all to
>>> MR> 2 1/4 square. Though some are  hyped as "full frame" digital.
>>> Referring to
>>> MR> full frame 645 not 6x6. And not even that.
>>> MR> 6x6 =  2 and a 1/4 square
>>> MR> Its 6 cm
>>> 
>>> MR> Mark William Rabiner
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Leo Wesson
> Photographer/Videographer
> 817.733.9157
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from editor at frontenachouse.com (editor@frontenachouse.com) ([Leica] Was 6x17 lust, now Noblex Oblige)
In reply to: Message from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] 6x17 lust)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 6x17 lust)