Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Unbelievable
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Sat Dec 20 18:08:50 2008
References: <200812191850.mBJIoLOK082794@server1.waverley.reid.org> <F2CB7526-0E54-4567-8BD3-FCBAD125CDFA@optonline.net> <279BCBA7039E46EB93719C56BFF713CC@xyw> <122120080018.426.494D8B5D0009A410000001AA223245003003010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com>

How does it matter where the lens is made? I do not understand this mental
block at all. After all, all that matters is quality should be maintained
across factories.
Cheers
Jayanand


On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 5:48 AM, <grduprey@mchsi.com> wrote:

>
>
> They are already doing this with their Summarit line of lenses, which the
> 28 Elmarit Asph should also fit into this category.  The problem they are
> having with this line is that many feel these are compromise lens designs,
> and not real leica lenses, although they are, and are actually made by 
> leica
> in germany, which you cannot say for the zeiss line of m lenses, but are in
> the same price point.  From what I have seen and this is also shown by
> Nathan's recent postings using his 35 Summarit, is that these are indeed
> worthy of the leica lable.
>
>
> Gene -------------- Original message from "A. Lal" <alal@duke.poly.edu>:
> --------------
>
>
> > Alternatively, the current Leica company could set up its own
> manufacturing
> > facilities in a low-cost country, while maintaining current QC standards.
> >
> > As I see it, Leica may be trying to follow the example the Swiss watch
> > industry which has not been price sensitive in the recent past. I do not
> > believe this strategy will work. Leica need to find a way to reduce
> prices
> > significantly while retaining quality.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lawrence Zeitlin"
> > To:
> > Cc: "Lawrence Zeitlin"
> > Sent: Friday, 19 December, 2008 2:29 PM
> > Subject: [Leica] Re: Unbelievable
> >
> >
> > > If Leica couldn't find an overwhelming sympathetic audience in the
>  LUG,
> > > it is unlikely to do so in the general camera using population.
>  Leica's
> > > plight is similar. on a much smaller scale, to that of the  U.S. auto
> > > industry. Their best bet might be to ask for a bailout or  bridge loan
> > > from the German government and, if they can't return to  profitability
> > > within six months, file for bankruptcy. Their best  strategy might be
> to
> > > sell the Leica name, patents, and manufacturing  rights to one of the
> > > Japanese camera giants. The precedent has been  set by Contax,
> > > Voightlander, and scores of others. Then perhaps we  might have
> affordable
> > > Leica cameras, although a bit plasticky.
> > >
> > > Larry Z
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Leica Users Group.
> > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from alal at duke.poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)
Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com) ([Leica] Re: Unbelievable)