Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm using too a Summaron 35 F3,5 on my IIIF, and I'm very happy with it, some examples: Here wide open at 1/15 http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Billares+Montforte/08070726.jpg.html http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Billares+Montforte/08070728.jpg.html http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Billares+Montforte/08070734.jpg.html http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Billares+Montforte/08070736.jpg.html http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/08070330.jpg.html http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/08070721.jpg.html http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/08070713.jpg.html http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/08070714.jpg.html http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/08070722_1.jpg.html I don't know how is the 2,8, but I like very much the grey scales I obtain with the 3,5 Saludos cordiales Lluis El 11/12/2008, a las 20:41, Seth Rosner escribi?: > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leonard Taupier" <len-001@verizon.net > > > Subject: [Leica] Summaron 3.5cm f3.5 example >> This is a film shot using the 3.5cm f3.5 Summaron on a Leica IIIc. If >> I recall it was shot at f8 > > Len, first, this is a low contrast subject. Second, at f/8 the > contrast of any lens will be at its highest. Try making a high > contrast image with this lens at 3,5. Then compare it with the 2,8 > Summaron at each aperture from 3,5 through f/11, same film, same > subject, same developing and printing, and the difference will pop > out. > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information