Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] (no subject)
From: huntmc2 at gmail.com (Marshall Hunt)
Date: Mon Dec 8 18:48:01 2008
References: <26F5D66276A6484389C44CAC681E6B71@TerryPC> <36157573352B4D45861ACBE32D2994AF@robertbxucevjs>

There were only 2000 M2R made, and those numbers are right in the middle of
the range.

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Robert Meier <robertmeier@usjet.net> wrote:

> Perhaps he misread the 9 for a 0.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "tm" <leicar8@hughes.net>
> To: <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 1:25 PM
> Subject: [Leica] (no subject)
>
>
>
> Stolen Leica camera tension!
>
> My father's M2R was stolen from his unlocked Camry a year before he died
> five years ago. I was frustrated inasmuch as I loved that camera and he
> guaranteed it would pass to me when he died. Well, since his death I have
> searched eBay for M2Rs periodically and never saw a matching serial number.
> However, yesterday I found that someone was selling one but they only 
> posted
> the first three digits of the serial number and the image of the front and
> top of the camera was too small to reveal it. I suddenly developed
> apprehension upon determining that the seller is based 5-10 miles from my
> parents' home, across the San Francisco Bay, and I sent the seller a 
> request
> for the actual serial number at 2:00 p.m. yesteday since the three numbers
> they gave matched my father's. With the sales invoice from 6/10/1971
> ($263.75) and the police report about the theft on my home office desk, I
> checked several times yesterday for a response but none came. The seller
> finally responded this morning and my apprehension dissipated. Here is the
> difference between the serial numbers:
>
> Stolen:     1249081
> Seller's:    1248981
>
> Weird, huh? Meanwhile, the search continues!
>
> Terry
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from leicar8 at hughes.net (tm) ([Leica] (no subject))
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] (no subject))