Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/12/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Negatives aren't turning out right. Or how I want them, at least...
From: len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Mon Dec 8 14:55:36 2008
References: <493D7E22.1090908@gmail.com> <B1F6DA3E-D567-4E9F-AED7-2632F61BF2D0@verizon.net> <493DA2EB.2060105@gmail.com>

Yama,

You might want to reduce your time a little because of the higher  
temperature. Try 8 1/2 min next time unless you can reduce the temp  
to 20 deg. I agitate continuously for the 1st 30 seconds and than 5  
seconds every 30 seconds. It's hard to say without looking at your  
negatives where the problem lies.

Good luck,
Len


On Dec 8, 2008, at 5:42 PM, Yama Nawabi wrote:

> It was 1:1 XTOL with Tri-X at ISO 400. The temperature was  
> inbetween 21 and 22C so I developed at 9 minutes per his times.  
> Agitation was 20 seconds non-agitation, 10 seconds agitation,  
> (basically a 150 degree flip every second, not very vigorously)  
> once again, per his method.
>
> Thanks Leonard.
>
> -Yama
>
> Leonard Taupier wrote:
>> Yama,
>>
>> Don't get discouraged, it looks to me like you're not far off. I  
>> assume by looking at your tags that you use XTOL. I would  
>> certainly recommend that you use bottled distilled water to mix up  
>> the developer and also in the dilution. Are you diluting 1+1 for  
>> Tri-X at ISO 400? Is 22 deg C. the temp you are using? And how  
>> vigorous is your agitation? We need your exact procedure to give  
>> you an educated opinion.
>>
>> Len
>>
>>
>> On Dec 8, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Yama Nawabi wrote:
>>
>>> already explained the problem in the description of my flickr  
>>> photos, so please click the following links for the problem:
>>>
>>> http://flickr.com/photos/helloyama/3093611810/
>>> http://flickr.com/photos/helloyama/3092808595/
>>> http://flickr.com/photos/helloyama/3093649582/
>>>
>>>
>>> trying to get tones that look more like this:
>>> http://bp2.blogger.com/_hrIwoHYnxgA/R58lE07mgiI/AAAAAAAAE-4/ 
>>> hQFaLCM3FW0/s1600-h/IMG11757s.jpg
>>> http://bp2.blogger.com/_hrIwoHYnxgA/R58lc07mgpI/AAAAAAAAE_w/ 
>>> lwghJ3RXF_k/s1600-h/IMG11751s.jpg
>>> http://bp2.blogger.com/_hrIwoHYnxgA/R58jV07mgLI/AAAAAAAAE8A/ 
>>> TIIoNF6WWxw/s1600-h/IMG11797s.jpg
>>>
>>> he doesnt photoshop, or anything. i've even been using his times,  
>>> agitation, and scanning method. everything is the same, yet my  
>>> negs are ****ty and his ain't. anyone got any hints?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from mknawabi.lug at gmail.com (Yama Nawabi) ([Leica] Negatives aren't turning out right. Or how I want them, at least...)
Message from len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Negatives aren't turning out right. Or how I want them, at least...)
Message from mknawabi.lug at gmail.com (Yama Nawabi) ([Leica] Negatives aren't turning out right. Or how I want them, at least...)