Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The only Hasselblad which would qualify would be if they made a back for the SWC. All the others you mention have the lens exit pupil plenty far enough away fron the image plane. --- On Sun, 2/11/08, Frank Filippone <red735i@earthlink.net> wrote: > From: Frank Filippone <red735i@earthlink.net> > Subject: RE: [Leica] R10 news > To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org> > Date: Sunday, 2 November, 2008, 2:41 PM > Can you point to a technical discussion of why this is so? > I have only heard the Leica point of view. > > It seems to me that if there were a good technical reason., > others would fool the path... Hasselblad, and third party > esoteric camera backs for MF and larger studio camera > included.... > > But Leica, in the M8 only, is the only believer....... > > > Frank Filippone > red735i@earthlink.net > > > There is a perfectly sound technical reason for it to be > better for the IR filter to be on "the other side" > of the lens with rangefinder lenses. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > information