Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/11/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hmmmm...I was hoping this one would be it (something I can afford, plus I have Canon glass). The only thing I can think of with the landscape is that the photographer focused on the ice to right center and let all else go OOF? I don't seem to have these issues with my 20D or 40D. The portrait is just over-exposed, and the skin tones seem unnatural plus, there is something distracting in the upper LH corner and she needs to see an eye doc. There may be something to this Leica business after all, but then I am just a poor amateur watching my pathetic portfolio (investments) fall by the day. Ken > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug- > bounces+kcarney1=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > wildlightphoto@earthlink.net > Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2008 6:48 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] R10 news > > George Lottermoser wrote: > > >The highlights look fairly decent in this sample. > >The shadows look like absolute plastic mush - devoid of fine detail. > >;~( > > > > > >On Nov 1, 2008, at 3:06 PM, wildlightphoto@earthlink.net wrote: > > > >> http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/eos5dm2/downloads/2_landscape.jpg > > > > And the chromatic abberation is horrendous. Why Canon would post this as > a 5DII sample is beyond my comprehension. I refuse to believe the camera > is that bad. > > Doug Herr > Birdman of Sacramento > http://www.wildlightphoto.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information